<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glucose Monitor Question</title>
	<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Neva Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-327</link>
		<author>Neva Marjory</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>OK, it was the ATLast. I think that's fairly hard
to use too and IMO is kind of ugly.&#60;br
does give fair readings so, you may want to stay with
it, or get to the Lifescan ULTRA.&#60;br
hadn't seen your other post to which I'm replying now,
when I asked for the name.&#60;br
brain now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it was the ATLast. I think that&#8217;s fairly hard<br />
to use too and IMO is kind of ugly.&lt;br<br />
does give fair readings so, you may want to stay with<br />
it, or get to the Lifescan ULTRA.&lt;br<br />
hadn&#8217;t seen your other post to which I&#8217;m replying now,<br />
when I asked for the name.&lt;br<br />
brain now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neva Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-324</link>
		<author>Neva Marjory</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I have been using the Accucheck Advantage machine
 since February. I'm also testing a machine for my
 nutritionist called At Last which does not require a finger
 stick. You can use your arms or legs instead of the
 fingers.&#60;br
 Yes, you have to use a test strips. Each box of tests
 strips comes with a computer chip. As long as you use
 the chips that come with the box each time, then the
 readings are accurate. Accucheck Advantage has two
 different types of test strips. The one I like best is the
 Comfort curve. This strip has a little cut out on the
 side so when you get a drop of blood you can hold your
 finger sideways to the machine and the cut out draws the
 blood onto the strip. The other strip requires you
 place the blood on top of the strip. Sometimes it
 &lt;!--more--&gt;
 smears as the blood sample is very watery. With the
 Comfort curve, even watery blood gets drawn in so it
 doesn't require another stick.&#60;br
 "pen" for the lancets that you can set to the depth you
 need so you don't feel the stick as much but still
 allows you to get an adequate sample.&#60;br
 Accucheck Advantage machine keeps the last 100 blood checks
 in memory along with the date and time, so if you
 forget to write it in the log book, you still have
 access to it when you do write it down. I tend to forget
 to write it down a couple of times a week.
 &#60;br
 to use as it has a "Straw" on the strip to draw up
 the blood but the "straw" doesn't always work. The
 machine also uses lancets, but you don't feel it going
 into your arm or leg. The machine requires you pump it
 to draw up an adequate sample and it does an average
 of the last 14 tests, but it's only good for 2500
 tests then you have to get a new one.&#60;br
 insurance covers the test strips for the Accucheck
 Advantage but not the lancets. I'm glad they do since I
 only pay $15 for 100 strips and retail is $65 - $70
 for 100.&#60;br</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using the Accucheck Advantage machine<br />
 since February. I&#8217;m also testing a machine for my<br />
 nutritionist called At Last which does not require a finger<br />
 stick. You can use your arms or legs instead of the<br />
 fingers.&lt;br<br />
 Yes, you have to use a test strips. Each box of tests<br />
 strips comes with a computer chip. As long as you use<br />
 the chips that come with the box each time, then the<br />
 readings are accurate. Accucheck Advantage has two<br />
 different types of test strips. The one I like best is the<br />
 Comfort curve. This strip has a little cut out on the<br />
 side so when you get a drop of blood you can hold your<br />
 finger sideways to the machine and the cut out draws the<br />
 blood onto the strip. The other strip requires you<br />
 place the blood on top of the strip. Sometimes it<br />
 <!--more--><br />
 smears as the blood sample is very watery. With the<br />
 Comfort curve, even watery blood gets drawn in so it<br />
 doesn&#8217;t require another stick.&lt;br<br />
 &#8220;pen&#8221; for the lancets that you can set to the depth you<br />
 need so you don&#8217;t feel the stick as much but still<br />
 allows you to get an adequate sample.&lt;br<br />
 Accucheck Advantage machine keeps the last 100 blood checks<br />
 in memory along with the date and time, so if you<br />
 forget to write it in the log book, you still have<br />
 access to it when you do write it down. I tend to forget<br />
 to write it down a couple of times a week.<br />
 &lt;br<br />
 to use as it has a &#8220;Straw&#8221; on the strip to draw up<br />
 the blood but the &#8220;straw&#8221; doesn&#8217;t always work. The<br />
 machine also uses lancets, but you don&#8217;t feel it going<br />
 into your arm or leg. The machine requires you pump it<br />
 to draw up an adequate sample and it does an average<br />
 of the last 14 tests, but it&#8217;s only good for 2500<br />
 tests then you have to get a new one.&lt;br<br />
 insurance covers the test strips for the Accucheck<br />
 Advantage but not the lancets. I&#8217;m glad they do since I<br />
 only pay $15 for 100 strips and retail is $65 - $70<br />
 for 100.&lt;br</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neva Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-310</link>
		<author>Neva Marjory</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 04:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>No problem, I was actually getting a bit
incredulous that accu-chek (I, like a fool, spelled it
properly: Accu-Check) was so 'hidden'. If not for mendosa's
site, I'c have been up the proverbial
creek.&#60;br</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, I was actually getting a bit<br />
incredulous that accu-chek (I, like a fool, spelled it<br />
properly: Accu-Check) was so &#8216;hidden&#8217;. If not for mendosa&#8217;s<br />
site, I&#8217;c have been up the proverbial<br />
creek.&lt;br</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neva Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-308</link>
		<author>Neva Marjory</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 01:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the sites concerning glucose monitors. I really appreciate
you taking the time to help me out!&#60;br</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the sites concerning glucose monitors. I really appreciate<br />
you taking the time to help me out!&lt;br</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neva Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-298</link>
		<author>Neva Marjory</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2004 07:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2004/05/03/glucose-monitor-question/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Scratch that web addy...sorry...&#60;br</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scratch that web addy&#8230;sorry&#8230;&lt;br</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
