<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MEDICAL HISTORY: A TRADITION OF</title>
	<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2003/12/05/medical-history-a-tradition-of/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jules Xiomara</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2003/12/05/medical-history-a-tradition-of/#comment-202</link>
		<author>Jules Xiomara</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2003 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2003/12/05/medical-history-a-tradition-of/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>INCOMPETENCE (Part II):&#60;br
 historian W.J. Bishop states it a bit more elegantly: "This
 meant that the sciences of anatomy and physiology,
 which are the bedrock of all medical knowledge could
 not be studied in a practial manner."&#60;br
 consequence of this no-surgery-studied-at-school clause weas
 that doctors training at universities in the Middle
 Ages did little more than listen to pompous theorizing
 about the four humors of the body. Complained
 iconoclast doctor John of Salisbury back in the 12th
 century: "(Doctors) will describe to you minutely the
 origin, the progess and the cure of all diseases. In a
 word, when I hear them harangue, I am charmed; I think
 them not inferior to Mercury or Aesclepius, and almost
 persuate myself that they can raise the dead. There is
 &lt;!--more--&gt;
 only one thing that me hesitate; their theories run
 directly opposite one another, as diffent as light to
 darness.&#60;br
 was sounding the same theme: "Doctors," states a
 character in The Imaginary Invalid, "know the majority of
 scholarly studies, know how to speak elegant Latin, know
 all the ancient Greek names for the diseases, can
 define them and categorize them. BUT, as for CURING
 them, they know nothing at all. Listen to them speak,
 these best-dressed men in the world; watch them heal,
 these most ignorant of all men."&#60;br
 say there weren't medical breakthroughs prior to the
 20th century. Of course there were: Hippocrates
 (460-377 B.C.() could set a broken leg (and write an oath
 forbidding doctors from seducing their patients); Fleming
 Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) diagrammed correct anatomy,
 i.e., internal organs and veins; Frenchman Ambroise
 Pare (1510-1590) -- using compassion and common sense
 -- revolutionized surgical techniques and even
 designed a functional prosthetic arm; Englishment William
 Harvey (1578-1657) discovered that blood circulates,
 pumped by the heart.&#60;br
 on these breakthroughs by exceptional doctors and
 gloss over the pervasive failures. (Professional
 courtesy apparently extends even to history.) SO in the
 interest of fair play, we will recount some of the
 lowlights of medical history and give "snapshots" of some
 genuinely odd developments.&#60;br</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INCOMPETENCE (Part II):&lt;br<br />
 historian W.J. Bishop states it a bit more elegantly: &#8220;This<br />
 meant that the sciences of anatomy and physiology,<br />
 which are the bedrock of all medical knowledge could<br />
 not be studied in a practial manner.&#8221;&lt;br<br />
 consequence of this no-surgery-studied-at-school clause weas<br />
 that doctors training at universities in the Middle<br />
 Ages did little more than listen to pompous theorizing<br />
 about the four humors of the body. Complained<br />
 iconoclast doctor John of Salisbury back in the 12th<br />
 century: &#8220;(Doctors) will describe to you minutely the<br />
 origin, the progess and the cure of all diseases. In a<br />
 word, when I hear them harangue, I am charmed; I think<br />
 them not inferior to Mercury or Aesclepius, and almost<br />
 persuate myself that they can raise the dead. There is<br />
 <!--more--><br />
 only one thing that me hesitate; their theories run<br />
 directly opposite one another, as diffent as light to<br />
 darness.&lt;br<br />
 was sounding the same theme: &#8220;Doctors,&#8221; states a<br />
 character in The Imaginary Invalid, &#8220;know the majority of<br />
 scholarly studies, know how to speak elegant Latin, know<br />
 all the ancient Greek names for the diseases, can<br />
 define them and categorize them. BUT, as for CURING<br />
 them, they know nothing at all. Listen to them speak,<br />
 these best-dressed men in the world; watch them heal,<br />
 these most ignorant of all men.&#8221;&lt;br<br />
 say there weren&#8217;t medical breakthroughs prior to the<br />
 20th century. Of course there were: Hippocrates<br />
 (460-377 B.C.() could set a broken leg (and write an oath<br />
 forbidding doctors from seducing their patients); Fleming<br />
 Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) diagrammed correct anatomy,<br />
 i.e., internal organs and veins; Frenchman Ambroise<br />
 Pare (1510-1590) &#8212; using compassion and common sense<br />
 &#8212; revolutionized surgical techniques and even<br />
 designed a functional prosthetic arm; Englishment William<br />
 Harvey (1578-1657) discovered that blood circulates,<br />
 pumped by the heart.&lt;br<br />
 on these breakthroughs by exceptional doctors and<br />
 gloss over the pervasive failures. (Professional<br />
 courtesy apparently extends even to history.) SO in the<br />
 interest of fair play, we will recount some of the<br />
 lowlights of medical history and give &#8220;snapshots&#8221; of some<br />
 genuinely odd developments.&lt;br</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neva Marjory</title>
		<link>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2003/12/05/medical-history-a-tradition-of/#comment-201</link>
		<author>Neva Marjory</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2003 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diabetes-symptoms.pocket-book.com/2003/12/05/medical-history-a-tradition-of/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Funny, despite all the breakthroughs in Medical
Science there still are an awfull lot of incompetent
Doctors out there. For a Doctor to have an educated
Patient is like a slap in the face to them. Good story,
can't wait for part2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, despite all the breakthroughs in Medical<br />
Science there still are an awfull lot of incompetent<br />
Doctors out there. For a Doctor to have an educated<br />
Patient is like a slap in the face to them. Good story,<br />
can&#8217;t wait for part2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
